“Watching old movies is like spending an evening with those people next door. They bore us, and we wouldn't go out of our way to see them; we drop in on them because they're so close. If it took some effort to see old movies, we might try to find out which were the good ones, and if people saw only the good ones maybe they would still respect old movies. As it is, people sit and watch movies that audiences walked out on thirty years ago. Like Lot's wife, we are tempted to take another look, attracted not by evil but by something that seems much more shameful -- our own innocence.”
-Pauline Kael

"How far are you going?"
"About thirty years."
-Back to the Future teaser trailer

Saturday, September 17, 2011

"Everyone runs in her own way, or his own way. And where does the power come from, to see the race to its end? From within."


Impressions: Chariots of Fire

So after writing about what might be my favorite film from 1981, I now will discuss the picture that was given the Best Picture Oscar honors for that year: “Chariots of Fire”. I can honestly say that while it’s a fine movie, it in no way excels “Raiders of the Lost Ark” or the more acceptable (in Oscar standards) fellow Academy Award nominee “Reds” in terms of presentation or execution.


“Chariots of Fire” is, in simplicity, a sports movie. What makes it slightly different is that its focus is on the competitors rather than the actual competitions. The sport is running and the distinction between the two main protagonists is their individual religious faiths. It is their background and beliefs that serves as the main obstacles in the plot, and that’s where the problems with the film start to arise. One athlete, Harold Abrahams, is of Jewish descent, and is always trying to prove himself despite his heritage. The opposition he has to overcome, however, is very subtle not overtly confrontational. The worse he faces is censure from the heads of Cambridge University (one played by a criminally underused John Gielguld). Their criticism is of Abrahams use of professional trainer Sam Mussabini (played wonderfully by Ian Holm) which is couched as an excuse to show disapproval for Mussabini’s ethnicity. These events are not nearly forceful enough to derail Abrahams and don’t serve as strong complications to overcome. In fact, the despair he feels upon his first defeat would have been more interesting to delve into but the plot spreads itself too thinly between Abrahams' self-worth and racial opposition while it follows his character arc.

Eric Lidell is the other runner, who is a devout Scottish Christian. The hurdles (no pun intended) he has to face are less complex than Abrahams. After missing a church meeting because of his running, he is looked at disapprovingly by his wife, but that becomes easily dismissed by the line said by Lidell: “I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast. And when I run I feel His pleasure.” The other moment that stands in his way is during the Olympics. Lidell has a race scheduled on a Sunday. Lidell, being a devout Christian, refuses to run on the Sabbath. He faces pressure from Olympic officials and even the Prince of Wales (all very subtly of course) to run, but this is also sidestepped very simply and quickly by another runner and friend who trades his place at another race time and offers it to Lidell. For me, it was too quick and easy a resolution.

Although the film suffers from weak plot elements and some gut wrenchingly awful scenes (the first racing defeat by Abrahams is horribly edited and scored), the movie has some strong points mostly centered on the acting. Ben Cross and Ian Charleston as Abrahams and Lidell give very solid performances as athletes who strongly believe in their pursuit of running as a form of expression. And Ian Holm as Mussabini steals every scene he is in.  My favorite moment from the film is practically a silent one involving Mussabini in a rented room just outside the Olympic events stadium because he is not allowed inside because of mitigating reasons. Knowing the time, Abrahams’ event is supposed to start, he can only hear the event as it proceeds. Afterward, when he hears the British national anthem playing signaling that Abrahams has won the race, he wanders around the room for a moment in repressed excitement to finally belting out a whoop of expressed satisfaction. Holm definitely deserved the Best Supporting actor nomination for this role.

The one last criticism I’ll levy at this film is the theatrical score composed by Vangelis. Outside of the opening theme and a few sparse moments in the film, the music felt mismatched to the sportsmanship-like presence of the movie. The horrible discordant musical cue at the aforementioned defeat of Abrahmas made me wince upon hearing it. Maybe this was supposed to make me feel the pain that Abrahams was going through at his defeat, but all I could think of was how badly the music sounded. Of course, the Academy in its continuing infinitesimal wisdom gave the Best Score Oscar to Vangelis for this movie robbing John Williams of what might be his finest musical score in “Raiders of The Lost Ark”.

After all this critique, you might think that I didn’t like “Chariots of Fire”. In fact I enjoyed the film but mostly because of the actors’ performances rather than the plot. Perhaps because it was based on actual historical events gave it more gravitas when it was initially released. However the content of the film has a very soft punch to it and really glosses over the difficulties the protagonists may have had. After watching the film, I was impressed with its focus on following the story of these two athletes rather than the sporting competitions, but the events depicted were never really impactful enough to leave an indelible impression.

No comments:

Post a Comment